Instead of paying artists more, they develop features like blending music with friends, which is a super cool idea but, since the only option is Facebook to make significant use of them, I find Spotify's social features to be pretty DOA anyway. I don't want the first thing I see to always be their own adverts or podcasts. Just now when I opened it, there was a huge notice about playing music to get dressed to (go away!). I have a free subscription to it, but Spotify just keeps trying to shove things down my throat. So really, the only reason to switch is for better audio quality. Plus, they use MQA for that, which is like basically doing everything wrong you can, when it comes to HiFi audio. First of cause only like a third of their library is available in that better quality. Oh, and if you switch, only get the basic HiFi subscription, not the Master One. So there is a good chance when making the switch you will have to drop some of your favourite albums/songs, like i did.Īnd the artist page can also be a little messy at times, with like them listing multiple artists as one, or if have some the same name, throwing all their albums on one artist page, stuff like that. The curated playlists are ok and the staff pick section can be interesting, though the staff here apparently is kinda boring for the most part.Īnd they do just have a smaller library than spotify. However, like I said, still mainly Spotify, so like 90% Spotify basically. I mean, the interface is extremely similar to Spotify, though it does have a bit more of a magazine feel, similar to qobuz. I just did the switch recently and gotta say, if you do not care about the better quality / don't find it noticeable, it's not worth it. Whatever trickles down to the artists depends on their deal with the label. So a much smaller piece of a much larger pie is still a bigger piece of pie.Īlso, labels get most of the money anyway. She would get $600,000 from Spotify and $65,000 from Tidal. Then let's say every single subscriber to both services streams Beyonce's new hit. 0.3 cents for Spotify (another widely reported number). Or, looking at it another way, let's say Tidal pays 1.3 cents per stream (a meaningless but widely reported number) v. And that's likely being generous to Tidal. 200 million for Spotify), $7 billion in Spotify payouts is probably more than 10 times Tidal's total revenues and more than 30 times Tidal's payouts. Just based on number of subscribers (which is unknown for Tidal but estimated to be about 3 to 5 million v. Looking at it that way, Spotify paid out $7 billion in royalties last year. That payout is then divided up based on number of plays per artist, with top played artists getting most of the money. Streaming services contract with labels to pay out a percentage of total revenues. I am still not totally sure I’ll keep Tidal past the trial but leaning yes.įirst, comparison of per-stream payouts isn't valid because of how they are calculated. But that doesn’t mean I can’t hear it very clearly when directly comparing. Not that Spotify doesn’t sound great - if you quizzed me blindly I would likely fail. The difference is very, very clear to me toggling back and forth on the same song between highest quality Spotify, and Tidal. The music is shining in a way I have never experienced. I am in awe and smiling re-listening to some of my favorite artists. I got Tidal highest tier (master quality recordings, is how they sell it). I just bought a pair of AirPods Max for the combo of comfort (top prio) and quality. For example, for headphones I value long session wear comfort most, over quality, and have never owned anything considered audio-focused gear. I love music, and pay attention to the details, love quality etc BUT I am absolutely not an audiophile. Replying to this old thread just to share in case it’s helpful to others.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |